I am enamoured by the detail of Mario's eyes, so they look fine to me. As for Mario's eyes, I feel that it's one of those styles that looks different enough to be distinct as to make some people unfamiliar with it. When I saw one of the Youtube Poop videos where Mario was voiced over by a few sound clips from Mario FUNdamentals, I thought that it's a really nice touch, and accepting to the idea of the DiC cartoons Mario being voiced by him.Ĩ) So you don't treat Baby Mario as Mario?ġ3) One thing I thought was strange when looking at Mario's art is his eyebrows, like as if they are not part of his face, so I agree with the eyebrows part. In fact, I love the Mario Press Conference and the video where Mario talks about the 3DS. I really love it when he voiced Mario like a regular person, because he's quite lively and fun to listen to. Don't make him grin so widely or make his eyebrows so high.Ĭlick to expand.3) I don't mind Mario in the cartoons being voiced by Charles Martinet himself. Or, they can tone down on the happy face. It's great to look at, but as I said earlier, the rendering on Mario's eyes needs to be toned down because he looks overeager. I slightly prefer Mario versus Donkey Kong over the stuff from 3D World probably because he conveys more serious emotions rather than the typical happy excited mouth open stuff. It's another common style that Mario uses. I wish he had a mouth drawn in, though, since the lack of it doesn't really do it any favors. It has personality, and Mario generally looks much more serious. I think the eye rendering can be toned down a bit, that's probably just me. In the Wii U times, though Mario looks a bit overeager. It's the standard art style, so nothing to complain about. It's not bloom in the Galaxy that's rim lighting. Namely, there's no Mario art for me to comment on, but if there were, I'd say it'd be nothing withstanding. I miss this style, though, and it doesn't seem like it's going back.

Somehow, for me, he seems cockier here than later after Luigi's Mansion. That being said, Mario does have a different face. It's laughably outdated today with its simplistic shapes and renders. Anyway, this style captures Mario's expressions pretty well while retaining his appeal, so, again I like it. Mario definitely works as a blend too since he has both elements really (but I'd say he's leaning more to western). I wish it was more like that.Ħ) Club Nintendo/Nintendo Power Mario Comics Art Style I'd like to see a more to-the-games look of Mario in manga, but this is good, and I like grossly exaggerated, but still appealing Marios. Mario also looks really adorable too, but so does every other character. Mario isn't really fat in the Super Mario-Kun, but he's more deformed, with a proportionally bigger head and shorter arms, even well into later eras. He shouldn't be as chunky, but otherwise, I have no qualms about this one.ĥ) Manga Mario Art Style (Mainly Super Mario-Kun) The great thing about Mario is that he works in both anime and western. I dig the western style, admittedly much more than anime style (and I draw it western-like anyway). Creepy, excessively fat, no white speck in the eye like it should be, scary voice, four fingers, nope. The Hotel Mario incarnation is beyond awful, though. He still looks like himself, though, and if he had Charles Martinet's voice, I totally don't mind it. Mario looks especially chunky, so not a big fan of that. But, hey, this Mario is cute, and that's what counts for me. The good thing about this Mario is that it gave rise to the familiar Mario, but I like his more realistic proportions more.

He started out pretty stubby, but around Super Mario 64, he has a bit more realistic proportions. You need to mention the length of Mario himself, mainly his legs. time, but I grew up beyond Super Mario 64 so these look alien to me. Mario looks kind of cute during the Mario Bros. Mostly comments on Mario's art style over the years.

Super mario 64 fan art